It seems like every time I turn on the TV and switch over the news I find something that really interests me or drives me insane. So I figure that this would be a good place for me to talk about that stuff.

So I turned on the TV this morning and found Sarah and John talking about their imaginary change. Palin spoke first and it was business as usual. She talked about all the "change" she made in Alaska as Governor and continued to skew the facts of what really happened to make it fit her agenda. "I said 'thanks but no thanks on that bridge to no where,'" however she was very much for the pork barrel project when it was the popular thing to do and while running for office in alaska she even stated that she would rather see big construction in the present as opposed to taking the time to raise the money for her state to build it themselves. After that she moved to her son's service in iraq, which has not started yet and prior to which he was a member of the Alaskan National Guard. I find it a little odd that Track has to go to Iraq while mommy is 55 days away from the general election. She also talked about how she changed Alaska by taking away power of the government, but yet I find it odd that her prior brother-in-law gets thrown off the force because he tased her eleven year old nephew -I'm not saying it is ok to taser an eleven year old child, but I'm saying that that is something that should have been solved through the judicial branch not the executive. And she just couldn't help herself before she ended her speech and brought up that McCain is the only man in this race that has ever truly served this country. Yes McCain was a very P.O.W and nothing should be taken away from him in that regard, however I think it is a little ridiculous that they blame Obama for not being a part of the military while he was busy making change as a lawyer and sitting on community councils (the one's that help get kids off drugs, but apparently thats not very important to Palin). And then the lying was finally over.

I would continue to talk about what McCain said, but he put me to sleep. Luckily I was able to catch the part when the crowed start to chant country first after which, instead of talking about how he intents to put the country first, which is what the crowded was asking for, he moved on to the next line in the prior written speech that has been slightly tweaked so that it isn't identical every time he speaks. Do we want a man in office that can't think on his fight and instead has to rely on his crutch? I sure don't.

Palin this is her NRC speech, it's just a longer version of all her other ones.

This is all i have today. This is a day that should be remembered as a day where we lost our fellow Americans and not used a scare tactic to lure voters to a certain party. I fear for a party that doesn't have enough morals to not use a day as horrifying, disheartening and just simply sad as a way to get votes. Where has our country gone wrong?

Because of my conscience i can not embed this video and caution you in your choice to watch this video. RNC video

Money as Debt film

This film is directly related to what I am talking about with how trickle down economics. This is because the people who are being taxed are forced to take their money out of the bank and therefore the bank doesn’t have the enough money to back the former deposits. The banks are not required to have and equal amount of paper money in their vault as the books say has been deposited there. This causes a problem when everyone at one time comes in to withdraw all of his or her money at one time because the bank doesn’t have it. This means that no matter what the rich are making the banks with crash because the large base of their money supply is pulling out their money and therefore banks are failing. Once banks fail then the economy is soon to follow because without banks there is no way to create money with out printing and the more money that is printed the higher the inflation of that money and then prices will soar. Also by having an economic system that can cause a run on the bank is a terrible idea because it will make it almost impossible for middle class people to purchase homes, cars and other large ticket items that play such a great role in economy. Without a house or a car it is almost impossible to get a job. Without a job the person with be unable to make an economic gains. When this singular person represents the mass majority of the society (which is what trickle down economics creates) then the mass majority of the consumers are unable to buy things. The society will crumble without consumption.

The idea of making money out of money has become the retirement fund of many of our current workers because of the lack of a plausible longer social security system. Savings accounts with a certain amount of money can fund one person for the rest of their life so long as they spend a limited amount of money everyone. As long as you are making more money off your money then you spend why in the world should you work. This causes the rich to have less need to work. This also leads a limit need to invest in things that create jobs for the lower class (yet again showing that trickle-down economics doesn't work). This means that is impossible for lower class or middle class people to find a way to make the money they need to pay back their loans and therefore the created money never gets put into the system. This limits that amount of money that can be created by the banks and will eventually cause they system to hit a wall.